Cult v religion - ABC Online18 November 2009, 7:06 pmELEANOR HALL: Depending what country you're in, Scientology could be a religion, a cult, a quasi-religion, or a religious charity.
It was founded by the science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard in the early 1950s and in 1983 the Australian High Court ruled it is a religion.
Dr Rod Blackhirst is a lecturer in philosophy and religious studies at Melbourne's La Trobe University.
He told Barney Porter that Scientology is able to thrive because of the difficulty in defining religion.
ROD BLACKHIRST: Generally speaking, it seems to behave what you'd describe as a cult, certainly not as a full blown religion in the sense that Christianity or Buddhism or Islam are religions. It's a new religion, there's lots and lots of these new religions. By and large they're referred to as cults or sects.
BARNEY PORTER: You're saying it is a new religion and you're saying it's a cult, I mean do we need to come up with a definitive definition here?
ROD BLACKHIRST: Yeah that's the problem, there's no certain definition of what a religion is and Scientology plays upon that. It thrives in that ambiguity of exactly what a religion is.
And in different parts of the world there's different answers to that; largely decided by courts and judges because religions in this particular case, come with tax exemption and that really is the crucial issue.
What is a religion? Only matters in the public sphere in as much as in most places it provides you with a tax exemption.
BARNEY PORTER: It has elements of Freud, Buddhism and Hinduism; it seems to draw on several philosophies.
ROD BLACKHIRST: It's essentially a mishmash of stuff, it's syncretic, that is to say. By and large it's closest I guess to Buddhism in some ways. Basically what L. Ron Hubbard did - the founder of Scientology, he was a science fiction writer and he took some of the basic simple techniques of Buddhism and as you say, elements from other religions and he re-packaged them with a scientific veneer and then linked it to his particular science fiction.
So it's a very strange sort of mixture of stuff from all different traditions; but probably closest in some ways a perversion of the doctrines of Buddhism.
BARNEY PORTER: Is it dangerous?
more at
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2009/s2746299.htm