Print

[ethercat]

I was watching Nancy Many's speech from the Hollywood press conference and thought I should post this YT channel with the entire playlist of ex-scientologists speaking out about abuses and exploitation within the cult.

Nancy Many has some very interesting things to say about OSA and their tactics.

http://www.youtube.com/user/ScilonTV#p/c/CF2D1BD7CE2CE237

I don't think we've touched on the subject of OSA here much before.  It's a mixed subject, because, on the one hand, when one wants the general public to get involved in actions to put a lid on scientology activities, one doesn't want to frighten people off; but on the other hand, it is something anyone speaking out about scientology should know about.  It would be irresponsible to avoid the subject.

For anyone lurking who doesn't know, OSA (stands for Office of Special Affairs) is a branch of the scientology organization which deals with PR related to scientology, both pro and con.  This means that when there is a new article to be done by a local paper, the local OSA representative gets involved to provide the pro side of the story.  When there is criticism, or a negative article, OSA gets involved in that too.  There is more about the divisions of OSA here: http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=190307&postcount=47

As most regular organizations have a PR agent to handle publicity, that is not so unusual, so I will talk about the way negative press or public criticism is dealt with by OSA.  Most reputable organizations don't have a specialized person or group to "handle" the people who would speak negatively about their product or organization.

By "handle," I don't mean the way most organizations counter negative statements.  In the mass of literature left by L. Ron Hubbard, there are instructions for dealing with negativity.  These instructions are to discredit the critic in the minds of the undecided (by smearing, portraying as crazy or insane, bringing up and misstating incidents from their past, focusing on their faults, bringing up conflicts of interest, to name a few).  The instructions also state that the critic should be dissuaded by overwhelming them until they stop (by distraction, giving them more to deal with than they have the time or strength to accept, by "noisy investigation," suing them if they have any conceivable reason to do so, gaslighting them or driving them over the edge or to suicide, just your garden variety psychological terrorism, and other things which I am not evil enough to think of off the top of my head).

Probably the most famous and extreme case of this in in the instance of the journalist and writer, Paulette Cooper, and recipient of scientology's Operation Freakout for her book Scandal of Scientology, which is online here: http://www.clambake.org/archive/books/tsos/sos.html.  In 1977, an FBI raid on the Church of Scientology turned up orders to deter her, “To get P.C. incarcerated in a mental institution or jail, or at least to hit her so hard that she drops her attacks. ...[t]o remove PC from her position of power so that she cannot attack the C of S [Church of Scientology].”  She was sued, framed, harassed almost to the brink of suicide, and monitored daily by the "Church," via someone (Jerry Levin) who befriended her at one of her lowest points.  There is more about her story here, The Scandal behind "The Scandal of Scientology".

This type of treatment is not reserved for journalists, however; it is used against anyone who is enough of a threat to (having enough impact against) the "Church" of Scientology that they deem it a priority to "handle" the instigator.  "Enough of a threat" are the key words here.

Of late, the "Church" of Scientology's resources have become strained, and retaliation is not as much of a threat as it has been in the past.  They simply do not have the personnel to carry out as many harassment operations as they used to. 

Simply posting to a forum, making comments on a news article, or protesting is generally not sufficient for them to warrant the expenditures in funds and personnel.  Sending a member out to harass someone, while the member may comply with the request, is too likely to make the member question what he is doing.

However, this sort of thing does still go on.  Anyone with links to recent examples is encouraged to post them.

Certainly it pays to be alert and cautious, should you find yourself in the "enough of a threat" category, but always keep in mind that fear is OSA's greatest weapon. 

Many people think OSA is a group of bumbling idiots.  That way of thinking does a disservice to any who have been, or are currently being, subjected to OSA's tactics.  There are two types of methods employed by OSA - Overt Investigation, where they want you to know that you're being targetted, and Covert Intelligence, where they keep their investigations on the down-low.

Hubbard said that most people would cease "attacking Scientology" if they simply knew they were being investigated, so when you know they are there, it is because they want you to know.  Others required Covert Intelligence, which means that information is being collected about the person, and a plan devised for "handling" that person specifically. 

In one of the videos mentioned above, (specifically, part 3 of the Nancy Many segments at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IFelzYrXLE) Nancy Many says that "It's not the people that will get close to you that you will have to worry about, it's the people that will get close to your spouse, or a close friend; because you will tell that close friend things, and this new person that you don't even know about; these things are shared.  And that's how scientology does their intelligence.  It's not right up in your face.  When it's right up in your face, it's because they want it that way.  But their real intelligence, and how they gather what happens, happens sliding in under the door."

I tend to think that the "Church" has realized that the Overt Investigation and outright harassment makes them look bad, and is exposed rather quickly with today's fast media, and so rather than using the Overt to try to stop people, the type mentioned by Nancy Many is being used more often, to collect information about any activities which may have the power to severely damage the organization. 

Scientology followers and departments (such as OSA) subscribe to a method that Hubbard called the "Third Party Law."  This is spelled out in the Scientology Handbook as a method of avoiding or easing conflict, however, as it is with many tools, it can be used for good or bad purposes. 

OSA, being Hubbard followers to the letter, attempts to use this method to stifle critical activity, and I believe that this, along with the method mentioned in Nancy Many's presentation, are the most often used by today's OSA. 

You will likely not know, unless a mistake is made, or the operation is finished, that this has been used against you.  You may not even know then.  Be alert.  Examine inconsistencies.  Think critically about everything.

Below are some additional links which shed more light on OSA - what to watch out for, and how to counter these things. A search on "scientology operations" or "scientology harassment" will turn up countless others.

What I know OSA *HAVE* done and *ARE* doing in ANZO
http://exscn.net/forum/showthread.php?t=13008

Honeypots/traps & plausible deniability...
http://exscn.net/forum/showthread.php?t=13798

OSA Operatives: How-to Guide
http://exscn.net/forum/showthread.php?t=8249

Conversations with OSA personnel in the current climate
http://exscn.net/forum/showthread.php?p=201731#post201731

Manual of Justice
http://www.clambake.org/archive/go/man_just.htm

Intelligence actions, covert intelligence, data collection:
http://www.lisamcpherson.org/scans/GO_intel_actions_1969.pdf

SCIENTOLOGY'S SECRET SERVICE
An exposé of the shady activities of Scientology's intelligence agencies
http://www.clambake.org/archive/go/

[mefree]

Nancy Many speaks out again on Hawk Radio (http://www.hawkradio.com/cgi-bin/NewHawkRadio.pl).

Interview can be downloaded here http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NJBOFK8L

[ethercat]

One of the people who comments on Marty Rathbun's blog made this comment about OSA, which outlines the whole network and how it is organized:

http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/the-genus-of-insane-governments-organizations/

JF  // July 16, 2010 at 2:56 pm

As-Is,

NW stands for network.
OSA/DSA is Department 20 on the organizing/organization board ~ Department of Special Affairs, with the Director of Special Affairs ~ DSA~ in charge of the Dept in each org. It handles Public Relations, legal affairs, local government relations, immigration visas, etc. on behalf of the organization or ‘church’. (The Int Base in Hemet has its own local OSA/DSA office)

The Office of Special Affairs Network has its management Headquarters (OSA INT) on the 12th floor of the Hollywood Guaranty Building at 6331 Hollywood Blvd in Los Angeles.

It is only Dept. 20 (1/21th) of the Int Liaison Office (ILO) Org Board, though OSAI staff imagine themselves to be WAY ABOVE everyone else in importance in the command channels at the ILO.

The Headquarter has OSA sub-offices in the “continental” areas (regions or countries with 10 Class-5 orgs or more). For example, OSA Europe, OSA UK, OSA ANZO, OSA East-US. Large local areas have their own OSA sub-office, i.e OSA Flag Land Base in Clearwater, FL. There might also be an OSA PAC (Pacific Area Command) for the Complex orgs and local Los Angeles County area (?)

The continental OSAs then ‘manage’ the local Dept’s of Special Affairs.

The OSA Network (NW) is somehow the ‘CIA’ of Scientology.

Most of their work is “classified” and “Top Secret” since they “deal with SPs and lawsuits on a daily basis”, and the SP info “must not enturbulate” the other staffs and prevent them from producing and managing planetary Scientology. OSA also keeps Sea Org members in the dark on what is REALLY going on in the outside world. OSA staff have access to the internet and TV, others don’t.

* In other words, they hide their crimes and “official acts” from the rest of the ILO personnel and the public, under VERY HIGH security. It is given freedom to act secretly as it pleases, with unlimited financial resources. It is financed by the IAS, which is financed by parishioners’ insanely large $$ donations.

Some PR and Legal staff’s job duties include watching TV, especially the news, Entertainment Tonight, etc. on the job. Other Sea Org members are NOT allowed to watch TV or have TV sets, and get them confiscated by HCO and security personnel if found.

OSA Int is meant to be supervised by the Watch Dog Committee member WDC OSA and CMO Int Programs Operators for OSA – supposed to be.

In practice, RTC staff constantly bypass this line and issue orders DIRECTLY to OSA INT, often in person in their offices, to the point that RTC had the whole 11th floor (1 below) renovated, to ludicrously high standards, with a polished high grade stainless steel entrance, the works. Those renovations started the day after the “IRS win” Event in 1993, and were financed by parishioner donations, mainly IAS.

While other Sea Org units will be fed beans and rice for 3 meals/day, OSA staff always get great, restaurant-grade food plus snacks, EVERY DAY.

Included in the Network is the Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights ~ CCHR, and its little network of reporters, and, nowadays, rumor mongers and falsehoods inventors.

{The Freedom Magazine is written, typeset and produced by HQ and the Dissemination staff of the ILO, under the banner of CCHR. In the past, several articles have been signed by ‘assumed names’ to make believe they were written by a reporter, when in fact they were written by regular OSA Int rank & file.}

* Sorry this is a bit long, but it is a complicatedly complex network and ‘intelligence’ apparatus.

[ethercat]

Frank Oliver, a former OSA agent, has given a 208 page scanned document to Wikileaks which contains OSA investigations checksheets, "hat" writeups,  ODC checklists (Overt Data Collection, I think), network orders, "battle tactics," and more. 

Chuck Beatty posted the following to ARS:

Subject: Frank Oliver "Investigations Officer Hat Pack" full of Office of
 Special Affairs Network Orders, are important to SHARE with authorities
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d9c3ae74-e46d-4aae-8e21-31f1d7b9a6ea@g10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>

Thanks again to Frank Oliver for choosing to take with him his hat pack,
which was his to use for his training, and which is now on Wikileaks.

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Church_of_Scientology_Office_of_Special_Affairs_and_Frank_Oliver

Karen Jentzsch Delacaire benefited by using Frank's hat pack by her
providing some of the key Hubbard OSA scriptures to FBI and police, and it
instantly ended Scientology's dirty smearing game against her.

I think it is an all time important act to give  Hubbard's dirty
confidential ecclesiastical "church" scriptures to  authorities, my
favorite two scriptures to give authorities are  OSA Network Order 15,
"Black Propaganda", and policy letter "Targets Defense".

Thanks again Frank Oliver.

And thanks to Gerry Armstrong for inspiring Frank to follow Gerry's legal
case ruling which found that using Hubbard related documents to protect
oneself against Scientology, IS a logical move on someone's part who is
potentially going to be victimized by Scientology's "Black Propaganda" or
harassing tactics.

Hubbard's own writings are damning evidence that authorities are sorely in
need of reading when those authorities are being fed dirty propaganda or
agent provacateuring or "cry wolf" tactics unjustly against Scientology
critics and whistle blowers.

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Church_of_Scientology_Office_of_Special_Affairs_and_Frank_Oliver

Thanks Frank!

It makes for interesting reading, as well as "damning evidence."

[ethercat]

http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/radical-scientology-dark-ops/

Marty has posted a "Black Ops" program from 2006 which was written to "handle" Tory "Magoo" Christman.  I think it speaks pretty well for itself.

Tory's comments, when shown the document by Marty, are in italics:

Eyes Only
Confidential
Attorney-Client Privileged

March 31, 2006

Tory CHRISTMAN PROGRAM

Refs:

27 March 1972, COUNTER ATTACK TACTICS

28 March 1972, INTELLIGENCE PRINCIPLES

Information:

In July 2000 Tory Christman left the Church and dumped her husband of 26 years, to join the LTM in CW. While in Clearwater and being supported by Minton, she started picketing the Church. From there she got onto media lines and has given anti-Scientology lectures to the Skeptics. Tory has also been a conduit for disaffected ex-staff to get onto the Internet and leave Scientology. She has created a “third dynamic” of sorts, consisting of social contacts with ex-Scientologists friends and other DBs like Graham Berry, who she gets together at occasional parties held at her house. [Sentence deleted to protect privacy of target and third parties]

 **Correction: I never “dumped” my husband. I left a Cult, he divorced me, and re-married, staying “in”.

 When in July 2005 Harold Bezazian, Tory’s ex-husband, confronted Tory with all her lies about their divorce, she tried to deny it. However, she backed off from mentioning her husband again until recently in the Rolling Stone article. Despite the confrontation Tory had with Harold over the phone, she continues to leave messages on his voice mail wishing him happy birthday, merry Christmas, and other messages like that. She wants to keep a comm line with Harold, even though he told her to leave him alone because he got remarried.

**Note: The “lies” he told me are the same absolute lies OSA has pitched for 10 years about me. As I told him then, “my doors are open-I don’t know where you live, work, you won’t talk to me. I left a Cult. You left me. And you can tell OSA to Go to Hell”. That’s when, and only when, he told me he was married. And he changed his phone number—so my calling was in 2001 for a few years at most.

Having been married for 27 years, I find it interesting a “church” would promote this as something bad.

What Tory protects:

 Tory protects her reputation very heavily and anything done or said that would damage her reputation drives her insane. Case in point when she read the comment about her in the recent Rolling Stone article where she is described as “wacko” she immediately posted to ARS to DA the statement. Many other times she has displayed her insanity about trying to DA bad things said about her. Her biggest button is the Religious Freedom Watch (RFW) pages about her. She screams on ARS that RFW is full of lies about her. During a picket in 2004, Tory was asked to give specifics, but she started screaming like a nut and blew from the comm cycle. Many times on ARS she threatened to sue RFW but she never did. She wants those webpages down badly because they ruin her reputation.

**Correction: I’ve many times thanked OSA for RFW, once I realized they are the best display of their “Fair Game” usage. They are masters of twisting reality. I’ve said a skillion times, please come over, you’ve never even heard my side of the story. Not *one* Scientologist, as a member of C of $, will talk to me. OSA’s interpretation of my “Screaming like a nut” is just that. In “Fair Game” is says: “You can lie, cheat, steal, destroy someone utterly” and that is all this is. Their feeble attempt to once again smear one of their X-members, in fact, someone they have in their “What is Scientology” book.

She protects her job. The current job is the most stable one she ever had since defecting. Since mid 2005 Tory has been working at Specialty Merchandise Corporation (SMC). Tory is a business coach and teaches people how to start home based businesses and she has her own extension, 5606.

 Tory protects her comm lines to the media because these are the lines she uses to stir up entheta against the Church. Getting her properly DA’ed will make the media dump her as source of information about the Church.**Fact: Scientology has failed utterly at shutting me up, both with the media, and on the Net. Did I want to protect my job? Hell yes. Is there something wrong with that? Only they would see it as one more way to “Fair Game” someone.

 Tory has a lot of attention about her health and being able to pay for her medical care. In 2004 she went through skin cancer surgery which she incurrent $1,500 not covered by her insurance. She is also concerned about her memory deteriorating at a rapid rate (she has severe memory loses, and according to her, it has been worsening since 2004. Tory believes she will die in a matter of a few years because of her memory failing very rapidly. She also thinks she will get Alzheimer’s disease because her mother had it and she died of it at the end of 2004.

**Correction: What a load of crap. Line one: Sure, I have attention on my health and health insurance, as do most responsible people. Line 2 is a) False: My insurance DID pay for it and b) Where DID you get this private information from,
Scientology? That violates the HIPPA laws. ALL of the rest of that paragraph is utterly OSA making that up. Sure, it is well known that I have had trouble with my short term memory, thanks to the “church” of $cientology insisting I get off of my much needed medication for Epilepsy, having many Grand Mal Seizures. Back in 1973 until my Mom insisted I get back on my medication, saving my life.

Totally made up re “Worsening from 2004”—I never said that.

I fearing I’ll die in a few years is actually funny. I don’t fear it, however, since my Dad died at 52—I have said many times I’m thankful each day to be alive.

My Mother did not die of Alzheimer’s disease. She died at 85 of other causes.

One more flat out lie.

 ***Second note: Also, this was written in 2006. In the 90’s I gained 100 pounds while on Scientology’s “OT 7”. I kept asking for help, got NONE. I finally quit OT 7, joined Weight Watchers, lost 60 pounds, and left C of $, forever.

Later, while working at SMC, I gained back a bunch, so yes, I probably was concerned about my health-although not as they describe, even then.

Only when I finally figured out what *I* needed to do, did I fully lose the entire 100 pounds. I reached my goal weight in June of 2010.


 Tory has appeared on Channel 2 where she lied about several subjects. This is the direct result of the past few weeks counter-attack against Tory where her ex-husband had DA’ed her lies, she being under attack on ARS where she is getting expressed as a stripper, [portion blocked out as taken from target's pc folders]… and taking anti-depressants.

**My correction: I’ve ~never~ taken anti-depressants, but a
Dr. had given me something for possibly having ADD (which it turned out I didn’t have)—so I never took. Someone (not sure who—one of four possible people) came to one of my parties, went into my medicine cabinet, wrote down the name of that one medicine, and they began saying “How could Magoo be happy if she’s on anti-depressants?” Again, a total lie, as well as disgusting that they’d send someone into my medicine cabinet, and then make up this false story about me, again.

 PURPOSE:

 To dispense with a source of entheta and black PR so that Scientology can get on with its expansion unimpeded.

 MAJOR TARGET:

 Tory dismissed as an attacker or totally restrained and muzzled.

 PRIMARY TARGETS:

1. Internet Invest I/C OSA Int is responsible for getting this program done.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

2. Read and understand this program.
 _____________________

Internet Invest I/C

VITAL TARGETS:

   1. Arrange the needed funds to use the professionals needed to get the product, on investigations etc., as set forth in this program.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 2. Do not allow yourself to be cross-ordered.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 3. Use debug tech to debug any bugged target on the program.

_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 4. Clear your actions with counsel beforehand.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 5. Determine how to use the information gained throughout the execution of this program to accomplish the Major Targets.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 Operating Targets:

   1. Get Harold to call up Channel 2 and complain about the fact that they have put his ex-wife on TV and let her lie about their marriage and other things she has said and get their agreement not to use Tory any longer as a source of information about Scientology.
____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 2. Get Harold to call up the manager of SMC (Tory’s employer) and complain that she has been telling lies about him on TV while she is supposedly at work.
____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 3. Get Harold to send a letter to specific papers that have used Tory in the past and DA Tory and expose her lies. (This is the letter where Harold tells the story on how Tory broke up the marriage and other lies).
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

 4. Get Harold send the letter to radios where Tory has been hosted as a guest.
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

 5. Get Harold to brief [portion deleted to protect target's privacy] on what Tory is doing and the fact that she is lying about their divorce and spreading personal family matters on national TV. Get [privacy deletion] ideas of what [privacy deletion] can do to put pressure on Tory and threaten to cut [privacy deletion] comm line to her if she doesn’t stop.

**Fact: I never lied about our divorce, nor did I spread personal family matters, except to say that “My husband of 27 years left me, after I left Scientology” which was true. Also, despite my now X-husband allowing the flat out lies to be posted on Religious Freedom watch (C of S’s hate page)—he is a good man, he never liked OSA. He was raised with Hubbard back in the 50’s when his parents got “in”. I doubt he’d follow the above orders. I have no doubt they’d have someone they knew who would, call and lie, saying they were my x-husband. Sick.
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

 6. [One sentence deleted to protect target's privacy]
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

 7. Get the document that Tory threw away from one of SMC’s clients which contains personal financial information, brought to the attention of the client and have the client to complain with the company that Tory has lost personal information about his credit card and other financial details he has been doing with the company.

**Note: This is utterly weird, as *I* never brought home any information about any clients of SMC, as it’s all kept in their computers. This must be some fabricated thing, OR they’ve rifled through SMC’s trash, which quite frankly, could get them in some serious trouble. Their attorneys will *not* like this, Scientology—not even a little bit. They didn’t like you all to begin with, and are quite educated on this exact stuff. Start typing…..and to SMC attorneys, please do note the date you receive any future communications from “anonymous sources re Tory Christman”.
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

 8. Maintain the comm line with the client and get him to insist that Tory should be fired.
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

 9. Get Chad Garret (PI in LA) to use one of his resources to become a client of SMC and get assigned to Tory as a business coach (this can be done to first apply and then call in and asked to be put through to Tory’s extension as if she was transferred to her by the main switchboard).

**FACT: This seems utterly nuts to me, but I sure thank you all for showing how utterly sick you really are. I will be turning this all over to SMC, who knew quite well of your darker sides, and their attorneys will love this!
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 10. Get the new client hook up with Tory and get coached by her to set up a personal business.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 11. As Tory gets the coaching done get the client to become upset and bring it to her attention so she gets the warning that she is doing something wrong.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 12. Get the new client to complaint with management because Tory is not doing her job well and demand the money back because the client is no longer interested in SMC. 
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 13. Repeating Target: Get postings done in business newsgroups where they also discuss SMC. Post about Tory being incompetent and unprofessional.


** Note: This is flat out proof of your utter libel. It’s one thing to libel me on your phony “religious” site (RFW). This is getting into an entirely different category of public libel, OSA.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 14. Get a SMC client to find the postings and bring to the attention of SMC and let them know that this is not causing a good PR for the company and of it is true that this woman (Tory) is so unprofessional.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 15. Concurrently have other “clients” call into SMC and make complaints about Tory being rude and incompetent.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 16. Repeating Target: Continue to make noise till the company has no choice (due to the amount of bad publicity happening) other than firing Tory.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

**Note on #16: I worked for SMC for 4 years. This program was written in 2006.

I wasn’t let go until 2009, after the huge Economic Crash, when they let go of tons of people. I was with 100 people at the time, which they let go, so your above “program”, OSA, again, failed TOTALLY.

 17. Get complaints filed with the BBB complaint website talking about dissatisfied customers and complaint about Tory (keep it generic) but point out what we know about Tory to be true i.e. forgetting things, rude and arrogant.
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 18. Repeating Targets: Get the BBB complaints brought to the attention of SMC from people who have watched SMC’s advertisement on TV. (Write these letters from various parts of the US so it gives SMC the impression that this is everywhere and not a fixed location).
_____________________

Internet Invest I/C

 19. Repeating Target: Keep Schwarz attacking Tory’s reputation on the Net by feeding the repeating message that she had a lesbian affair in school (college);PBO:[privacy deletion] and her job as a stripper.
__________________

Internet Invest I/C

**LOL! OSA: You are one sick group of people.

 **And FTR: I was a dancer back in the early ‘70’s, with 4 other Scientologists. We were training, on the “Minister’s Course” in the day, dancing at night, for about 6 months, to pay for $cientology. Most people who know me know this-however, OSA, in hoping to slime me, of course is trying to use it. Where have they gotten some of this very private info from? Probably my PC folders, so thanks for telling the world you DO use info from them.

 20. Get Schwarz to put up a webpage on Tory and promote it on ARS and other newsgroups.

**Note: I knew that hag worked for OSA! (And please spare me the story of how she’s just some homeless, lost soul. She may be homeless—this program spells out the facts)
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

 21. Get mirror pages put up on the Net of Tory’s page and get it promoted so she gets to know that the word is spreading on who she really is.
___________

Internet Invest I/C

 22. Go through every single chat log and find every derogatory statement other people have made about Tory.
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

 23. Get a specific page put up on RFW with all the statements Tory’s own “friends” made against her on the chat.
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

 24. Get postings designed to get Tory introverted into her 1D health worries and repeat the message that she is a crazy person taking anti-depressants.
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

 25. Get the 3P campaign to cut her comm lines with other SPs on ARS and IRC done (this is a known button when she is not defended on ARS she gets upset and gets depressed).
___________________

Internet Invest I/C

**NOTE: I have never suffered from Depression, so that is totally false.
I don’t like being 3rd Partied (where people buy into Scientology’s Lies) and I’ve tried to tell people they are doing this. My true friends know this. Many others did turn on me, and I hope this teaches you to listen, and what lengths this sick organization will go to, to try to utterly destroy someone they don’t want speaking out.

 PRODUCTION TARGET:

 By 30 April 2006 Tory discredited with the media, dismissed as an attacker or totally restrained and muzzled.

Invest Chf

**TORY’S FINAL PRODUCT:
TORY HAS HELPED MORE PEOPLE GET OUT OF YOUR PHONY “CHURCH”
AND YOU HAVE FAILED ~~~TOTALLY~~. The 1st time I saw the above program was a few days ago, even though I’ve known they have been running some such thing on me for many years, including after this in 08 and no doubt now. Thanks for showing the world,

And even people who have been critical of myself, that you (OSA) DO

Create sick things like this. “Church”? Think again, my friends. Read, look,

Listen, make up your *own* minds.

http://www.youtube.com/ToryMagoo44

PEACE!

[ethercat]

Tory has also posted her "back story" - what was actually going on at the time she was deciding to leave Scientology:

The Back Story on Tory:

 I worked with OSA as a volunteer, (not staff) on and off for 20 years,
mostly in the PR area. Why they care so much about me is due to my auditor,
and then friend, Bill Yaud asked me to help him “Handle the critics” on the Net,
in the ’90′s. He asked me to “Open up anonymous
accounts”. I asked why? He said he wouldn’t tell me as “Then
they’ll get you in deposition and keep you there, and you don’t want that, do
you Tory?” Of course I said “no”…so I continued,
basically blindly believing him.

Some people may think: Why didn’t you go talk to…. Well, we had
to sign an agreement to NEVER TELL ANY EXECUTIVES of C of $, any
AUDITORS, ANY ETHICS OFFICERS, any Family, any friends
literally–we could not tell a soul–0r we had to pay $100,000 “. I
remember looking at Bill, and saying: “This looks like the old Guardian’s office
junk”. He: “Tory: LOOK AT ME. *I* (he, Bill Yaude) would never do anything
illegal”. I bought it.

As it got more and more mafia-like …I decided *I* needed to go onto the Net
and LOOK. The Day I did (and ARS was the only Newsgroup then)—OSA had
spammed it with tons of  baking recipes. In between many lines, were “I didn’t
say that! Scientology is changing my words” by various critics.Shocked, I
realized this train was WAY off the tracks. I did NOT get
into Scientology to stop free speech! That day I called Bill to tell him “I can’t do
this anymore, I have to get back to work”. I was literally scared to death–
realizing this was much worse than  I thought, and no doubt
was run out of DM’s office.

From there, Bill said, “Fine—just meet us at this apt. tonight, as we’ll need a
de-brief. I thought that was fine, and showed up on time. The apt. was dark,
and filled with me (all OT’s). Gavino (who ran the Top Secret OSA Int Internet
operation) came barging in, slamming the door open, yelling “I TOLD YOU SO!
I TOLD YOU ABOUT HER!!!”

It was about a 1 hour gang bang spiritual rape—with they screaming “What are
you going to say in Session about this?” (I actually had zero plans to say
anything to anyone, but as you can see, thanks to THEIR OWN ACTIONS, that
has changed, dramatically.)

I finally ran out, crying, and Bill knew at that moment he’d screwed up. It took
about 6 more months for me to FULLY wake up, but I really left the “church” of
$cientology, that night

The night I fully woke up, that was IT. I had been on OT 7 for 7
years with it not working, we being guinea pigs for the Golden Age of
Crap–and having to pay for it, too.So during that time, I had spent 10 years
reading self-improvement books, art, music, science, etc. I didn’t realize
it then, but I think I was actually stripping off lies and sort of
fixing myself, so when I woke up….that was IT.

You may know all of the above, or not plan to say anything. However, IF you
plan to, I wanted you to hear what actually happened, vs. the many variations
of what has been said occurred. I never posted on the Net for OSA.

Once I ended the top secret OSA Int Mafia—soon after I went onto ARS, and
made 4,000 posts in 4 weeks! I had decided the Critics were like the old
cowboys in the Wild West. They could talk, say what they wanted, do what
they wanted, and I wanted to find out what they knew that I didn’t. So I went
onto ARS …making super nutty posts, having no clue I’d meet Andreas who
would help me, and from that, I’d wake up FULLY and leave, forever.

What did he do that was SO dramatic? Well, had I not been in the Top Secret
Mafia, it wouldn’t have been SO much.We were constantly lying about our
names, even on the phone. Here was Andreas with his full name, address and
phone number listed. That did more for me, and what he said, than anything.
He said: “I believe in truth.I believe in looking at both sides
 I believe in having the courage to say what I think. I don’t think
Scientologists are bad, they’re just miss informed. Best wishes,
Andreas Heldal-lund”

I sat in my dining room after reading that, and cried for 4 hours, as that WAS
who I was when I joined Scientology, in 1969, age 22– 30 years prior. Then, at
53 (july 2000) couldn’t look at both sides, I couldn’t
tell the truth. I still had courage. I left a few days after that first
communication, forever.

As you know, I’ve been speaking out, ever since. They’ve been lying about me,
doing Fair Game actions on me, since the day they flew Yaude to Clearwater
where I was, to “handle me”, the second day after I arrived there. He told me:
“What has happened to you, case wise, is THE WORST
THING THAT COULD EVER HAPPEN TO ANYONE ON THE PLANET”. “We
are going to fix it all at no cost”.

I said: “If you paid me 1 million dollars I wouldn’t pick up your cans, Bill”.
That night OSA began “anonymously” lying about me, running “Don’t trust
Tory” on ARS.

I cannot thank ALL the people who have helped me over the years,
enough. Many will never know how much they have helped me.
What you are doing now, Marty, and all your posters here, is
terrific. I thank you ALL!

Hope that helps fill in any gaps.

Love to you,

Tory

[ethercat]

The "Church" of Scientology is apparently not taking the New Yorker article lying down, and have tried to send a plant in on Jason Beghe.

Journalists Beware of Scientology Inc Spy

Jason Beghe phoned me to catch up with hurricane aftermath news. He told me that shortly after the New Yorker story ran a John Connolly, who represents himself as a Vanity Fair regular contributor, phoned Jason.  Connolly tried to pump Jason for anything he knew about the New Yorker’s investigation.  A covert investigation of the author Lawrence Wright.  While doing so Connolly attempted to drive a wedge between Jason on the one side and Mike Rinder and I on the other.  Since Jason didn’t just fall off the turnip truck Connolly did, hard. 

John Connolly has been a Church of Scientology Office of Special Affairs informant for nearly two decades.  He has infiltrated several journalists doing stories on Scientology during that time, posing as a like-minded investigative journalist working on a Scientology story.  Journalists have apparently either not compared notes, or simply not noticed that Connolly hasn’t delivered on a Scientology story in the twenty years he says he’s been working on one.  Connolly was originally recruited by Eugene Martin Ingram.

Here is an excerpt from a document authored by then-DCO External OSA INT (currently CO OSA INT – and at all times since the early eighties to the present Intelligence Chief OSA Int effectively) Linda Hamel.  The document is dated, coincidentally, 14 February 2006 – five years ago, today.   It reports on Connolly’s spy work against the author of the unauthorized biography of Tom Cruise, UK journalist Andrew Morton.   

Read the blog for the 5 year old document by Linda Hamel.  What I wanted to point out was this comment by Nancy Many.  If anyone should know the lengths OSA will go to, it is she: Kathryn's Story

nancy many   |  February 15, 2011 at 6:20 pm  | Reply

This is so true. A few years ago I got a call from an Investigator doing a story on Scientology, that he could then sell his references and information to a real bona fide Investigator. That struck a Red Flag right away. Then he went on to ask me a series of questions and he asked that what I would be willing to say about all the Celebrities that I had worked with at CCINT, and also for years later, I FSM’ld them. He had already spoken to Karen Pressley. (Another former President of CCInt) First I traced back to the supposed “referral” of this individual” and found that was a lie. He mentioned that there is no way an investigative reporter would share his sources with others. Then I called Karen and we conversed about our questions we were asked, and it soon became clear that this “reporter” had asked me only about the Celebs that I knew it was an op. I wanted to continue to be in touch with this guy and feed him what we knew would freak them out. But Karen was so Angry she just outed him. I was also in touch with another investigator a real one, and he told me that OSA had used similar ruses in their actions against the IRS.

A few months later, or before, I was called by a “student” who was doing research and he had some Questions to ask me. He gave me the name of his advisor and her phone number and the college he was from. So, I said OK, I will do your survey. We got thru about 5 questions and then he began to ask me questions in the format the LRH had invented. These were not survey tools that were known to the public, my blood ran cold, and I knew I was talking to OSA, so I continued the survey, knowing it was an OSA Op.

And yes, I do know a lot of things about a lot of celebrities that I “shouldn’t Know”, from the availability of their PC folders to me – both at Int and CCInt. But I won’t mention any personal information that we discussed, not because I have a Priest/Parishioner rule, but just because there is so much trouble with being famous and the people that sold out to tabloids, these people to me were not “Celebrities” they were my friends. There are many Celebrities who have dabbled in Scientology for a while. I will never out the ones that haven’t outed themselves.
during those years, and with Karen, they asked her only about the ones with
Celebs during her years as an FSM.

But their research into what Karen and I would say to a reporter about these various celebs was what they were trying to find out. Find out how much of a threat we were, both of us knowing so many intimate Details of Celebs personal lives. They have no ethics in “outing” anyone they care too, and they were thinking that Karen and I would be just like them.
Nancy