Quote from: ethercat on March 04, 2011, 11:45A certified copy of this lawsuit has been entered into the RLUIPA lawsuit by the Defendant: http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/RLUIPA/2011_02_14_71.0.pdfQuote1 Attached as Exhibit 2 is a certified copy of a Complaint filed against Plaintiff in Dekalb Superior Court. The record of the Complaint has been truncated for convenience. Specifically, included is the Dekalb County Superior Court’s Certification, the first page of the Complaint, and Exhibit 1 and 2 to the Complaint in their entirety.and Deb Danos has been called out for being untruthful in her sworn deposition testimony:http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/RLUIPA/2011_02_16_82.pdfQuoteContrary to the sworn deposition testimony of Deborah Danos, the lease for the North Shallowford Road property was for a three (3) year and seven (7) month term ending on April 15, 2011, subject to an earlier termination provided certain conditions were met. Compare Exh. 2, p. 3, 17 with Doc. 44-1, p. 34-35. The lease demonstrates that, absent termination which could not have immediately occurred due to necessary construction at the new facility, Plaintiff was obligated to pay this rent irrespective of the City’s zoning decision.How interesting it is when two lawsuits come together. Thanks to Skydog's observation and .... , lol!
A certified copy of this lawsuit has been entered into the RLUIPA lawsuit by the Defendant: http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/RLUIPA/2011_02_14_71.0.pdfQuote1 Attached as Exhibit 2 is a certified copy of a Complaint filed against Plaintiff in Dekalb Superior Court. The record of the Complaint has been truncated for convenience. Specifically, included is the Dekalb County Superior Court’s Certification, the first page of the Complaint, and Exhibit 1 and 2 to the Complaint in their entirety.and Deb Danos has been called out for being untruthful in her sworn deposition testimony:http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/RLUIPA/2011_02_16_82.pdfQuoteContrary to the sworn deposition testimony of Deborah Danos, the lease for the North Shallowford Road property was for a three (3) year and seven (7) month term ending on April 15, 2011, subject to an earlier termination provided certain conditions were met. Compare Exh. 2, p. 3, 17 with Doc. 44-1, p. 34-35. The lease demonstrates that, absent termination which could not have immediately occurred due to necessary construction at the new facility, Plaintiff was obligated to pay this rent irrespective of the City’s zoning decision.How interesting it is when two lawsuits come together.
1 Attached as Exhibit 2 is a certified copy of a Complaint filed against Plaintiff in Dekalb Superior Court. The record of the Complaint has been truncated for convenience. Specifically, included is the Dekalb County Superior Court’s Certification, the first page of the Complaint, and Exhibit 1 and 2 to the Complaint in their entirety.
Contrary to the sworn deposition testimony of Deborah Danos, the lease for the North Shallowford Road property was for a three (3) year and seven (7) month term ending on April 15, 2011, subject to an earlier termination provided certain conditions were met. Compare Exh. 2, p. 3, 17 with Doc. 44-1, p. 34-35. The lease demonstrates that, absent termination which could not have immediately occurred due to necessary construction at the new facility, Plaintiff was obligated to pay this rent irrespective of the City’s zoning decision.
There are some new documents in this case below.Previously seen, but renamed for better organization:http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2010-11-23-GeneralCivilFilingInformationForm.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2010-11-23-RequestForAdmissionOfFactsAndGenuinenessOfDocuments.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2010-11-23-ComplaintForBreachOfCommercialLease.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2010-11-23-Summons.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-01-06-EntryOfService.pdfNew:http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-02-04-Rule52CertificateDefendantsResponseToPlaintiffsFirstRequest.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-05-09-Rule52CertificateOfService-DefendantsFirstInterrogatoriesNoticeToProduceAndRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-05-13-Rule52CertificateAndPlaintiffsFirstInterrogatoriesAndRequestForProductionOfDocumentsAndThings.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-05-13-PlaintiffsBriefInSupportOfPlaintiffsMotionForSummaryJudgement.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-05-13-PlaintiffsStatementOfTheoryOfRecoveryInSupportOfTheirMotionForSummaryJudgement.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-05-13-PlaintiffsStatementOfUndisputedMaterialFactsInSupportOfTheirMotionForSummaryJudgement.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-05-13-PlaintiffsMotionForSummaryJudgement.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-05-13-PlaintiffsRequestForOralArgument.pdfhttp://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-06-02-NoticeOfHearing.pdf
http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10CV13242-4/10CV13242-4-2011-05-13-PlaintiffsBriefInSupportOfPlaintiffsMotionForSummaryJudgement.pdf
Not in response to you ST http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMWLjgPTR_c
I-Team: DeKalb Co. Judge Gail FlakeUpdated: Monday, 13 Jun 2011, 6:36 PM EDTPublished : Monday, 13 Jun 2011, 6:26 PM EDTDale RussellBy MYFOXATLANTA STAFF/myfoxatlantaDEKALB COUNTY, Ga. - A political bombshell was dropped in a DeKalb County courtroom on Monday. A former district attorney testified that some 13 years ago, he helped conduct a bribery investigation of a lawyer who is now a DeKalb County judge.The prosecutor is J. Tom Morgan, and the superior court judge is Gail Flake. The testimony came up in a civil case in which Morgan argued that Judge Flake should have recused herself because of his investigation. FOX 5 SENIOR I-TEAM REPORTER DALE RUSSELL HAS THE FULL STORY. CLICK ON THE VIDEO ABOVE TO WATCH HIS REPORT.
Moar to read!! Interesting stuff. Do we have a copy of their lease? Where I come from, commercial tenant is responsible to inform landlord immediately and in writing within 48 hrs, of any problems that would effect the habitibility of the premises. Many leases make the tenants responsible for all repairs. Curious what thir lease says. Anyone can say they complained but losing $50,000 in books and materials , well, they should have seen that coming. Why were the books on the floor to begin with
Tape 1, August 16, 1998Lawrence Wollersheim and Jesse Prince L: Testing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Today is the 16th of August, 1998. This is Lawrence Wollersheim, about 5:00 in the afternoon, sitting with Jesse Prince. We’re just going to talk about his time in Scientology and ask him different things. And this is my voice, the other voice will be Jesse’s.J: The voice he’s referring to is this one right here.L: OK. Tell me, the other day we were talking about Scientology tampering with judges. You mentioned that you had been interviewed by the FBI once before and that they had asked you about it but you didn’t tell them what was going on. Were you in Scientology?J: Yes I was. I told them the truth as I understood it at that time.L: You told them what you knew at that time, the truth as you understood it at that time. It was concerning a tampering with a judge. What was that judge’s name?J: Judge Mary Anna Fouser.L: This was in a case?J: A RICO suit brought against David Mayo, the AAC. CSC and RTC brought the action.L: What specifically did Scientology do to tamper with this judge, and if you can just try to describe what your knowledge is, and who was involved in doing it and if you know what they specifically did, or you don’t know what they did. Kind of, a person, an action, as much detailas you can have.J: What I would like to do is just start at the beginning. Any time a judge appears in a case in Scientology, good, bad, or indifferent, a common practice is to do an ODC, particularly if he’s a hostile judge, or is perceived to be a hostile judge. ODC means overt data collection. What would happen is, you’d get some guys normally from OSA Invest, and they would go and get as much public record as they could about that particular judge.L: Could you state what OSA Invest is?J: Office of Special Affairs Investigation Unit. It’s kind of like a low scale FBI investigotory group that investigates enemies and critics of Scientology.L: Great, go on.J: They do an ODC. If it goes further and the judge is really hostile, what they will do is go and start interviewing the associates of the judge, like trying to find out information in an innocuous way, or in a harsh way, to create intimidation. That’s a common practice, they do it with every judge. With Mary Anna Fouser, when we got on this case, an ODC was done on her. They kind of looked up her records as a judge, looked up her cases, found out where she lives, everything that they possibly could. Through lawyers and investigators, found as much personal information as they could about the judge, what she likes, what she doesn’t like, this kind of thing. Before any case is started, you have the profile of the judge, you have a profile of a prosecutor, if it is a prosecutor, or a profile of the opposing litigating attorneys............L: What they picked up in their investigation?J: To back the judges off.L: This is an important subtlety, because if they are gathering information about the judge’s sex life, his business life, his credit, anything that would embarrass or discredit him, then giving it to his associates.J: Let me finish. They would do ODC and CDC.L: CDC is what?J: Covert data collection.L: Tell us about covert data collection.J: Now ODC, you can go and get public records; CDC is going around and interviewing friends, associates, somehow getting ahold of bank records, somehow getting ahold of phone records.L: When you say somehow, would they obtain these in a legal manner, to the best of your knowledge?J: No. They would pay people to do it for them.L: They would pay someone else.J: …like a private investigator, if he said, "I can do this, I can get this."L: I can get illegal bank records, illegal phone records. They would knowingly pay him, he would tell the church, "I can get these illegal records," and the church would pay them. The people that would pay them are the attorneys.J: It would come through OSA, and the attorneys would pay the private investigators for investigation. It was like it was all legal, it looks all perfectly fine, but it would go from OSA to the attorneys they hired to the investigators, and that’s how they get their information.L: Would the investigators tell the attorneys that they could get these illegal bank records and phone records, or would they tell… J: Let me lay it out for you, OK. This is how it would be done. They had certain investigators, it’s like a network, Gene Ingram being the main one. He knows and works with all of these others. The thing would happen like this, "Hey Gene, it would be nice if we could get his bank records or his phone numbers to see who he’s calling." Or whatever else.
Author
Topic: CoS Georgia and Deborah Danos sued for Breach of Contract : Tenant Vacates, lol (Read 40294 times)