Author Topic: The Desmond Family v. Narconon of Georgia, Narconon International, et al  (Read 233160 times)

Offline Damian DeWitt

  • Met Xenu
  • Posts: 46
Harris Penn Lowry Delcampo have produced the finest legal drafting in any Scientology-related case in the last four years. They do not write stupid things like "Narconon is an off-shoot of the Church of Scientology" knowing well that it is in fact a Scientology-related entity per the cult's declarations to the IRS.

This bodes well.

Congrats again to TP for superb coverage of the Desmond case.


Offline SocialTransparency

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 1,326

 Must bump thread. :D

Offline mefree

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 4,367
Harris Penn Lowry Delcampo have produced the finest legal drafting in any Scientology-related case in the last four years. They do not write stupid things like "Narconon is an off-shoot of the Church of Scientology" knowing well that it is in fact a Scientology-related entity per the cult's declarations to the IRS.

This bodes well.

Congrats again to TP for superb coverage of the Desmond case.

Your comments are appreciated. This brief is explosive! :-thanks-:
The ultimate authority must always rest with the individual's own reason and critical analysis.
-Dalai Lama

Offline Mary_McConnell

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 2,888
    • Formerly Fooled Finally Free of The Deceptive Cult Called Scientology
I cannot see the judge denying the motion!  ;D

I am a volunteer advocate for victims of the Narconon scam. I am a former scientologist. I post anonymously. Mary McConnell is my long time nom de plume. Feel free to contact me for assistance in righting the wrongs.

Offline SocialTransparency

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 1,326
 Why on earth would Mary Rieser lie like this? Any person with half a brain knows those lies will come back to haunt you BIG TIME. If this case gets bound over to a criminal court people may go to jail. Maybe Mary will minister to the addicted while in prison. (:E)

Offline ethercat

  • Global Moderator
  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 3,770
Why on earth would Mary Rieser lie like this?

One word.  Desperation.
   Narconon Reviews
   Independent Reviews of the Narconon Drug Rehab Programs
   Answers to Frequently Asked But Seldom Answered Questions

Offline mefree

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 4,367
Why on earth would Mary Rieser lie like this? Any person with half a brain knows those lies will come back to haunt you BIG TIME. If this case gets bound over to a criminal court people may go to jail. Maybe Mary will minister to the addicted while in prison. (:E)

She actually strikes me as someone who does not realize how poorly she is responding.
The ultimate authority must always rest with the individual's own reason and critical analysis.
-Dalai Lama

Offline SocialTransparency

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 1,326
Why on earth would Mary Rieser lie like this? Any person with half a brain knows those lies will come back to haunt you BIG TIME. If this case gets bound over to a criminal court people may go to jail. Maybe Mary will minister to the addicted while in prison. (:E)

She actually strikes me as someone who does not realize how poorly she is responding.


 What scares me the most about this would be Ms Rieser is the founder and director of NarCONon of Georgia. She was also @ one time the local so called church of scientology,s big cheese here in Georgia

 Now after reading her latest depo material for the life of me I cannot see how this person pulled the wool over the eye,s of government officials and innocent families for so many years. It's shocking actually.

 This whole affair does not reflect well on our system here in Georgia. Its like the DCH does the bare minimum in keeping the citizen safe from harm. |$#!+|


Offline ethercat

  • Global Moderator
  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 3,770
Page 4:
Quote
It was not until two (2) years into the litigation - and numerous discovery requests and depositions later - that Plaintiffs received the bulk of the critical documents. Those documents showed that the Narconon housing had become so unsafe that a Board of Investigation was convened by NNGA that ultimately resulted in the Delgado's subsequent "probation." These documents directly refute NNGA's defenses and provide extensive evidence in support of Plaintiffs' claims.3

The documents also show that during this time NNGA had multiple reports of staff members using drugs and alcohol. There is also evidence in the new documents that shows that the Executive Director of NNGA altered evidence after Patrick's death, in what can only be viewed as an after-the-fact attempt to distance NNGA from the events leading up to Patrick's death. The newly produced information also references a number of witnesses who have never been identified in discovery. Lastly, the newly disclosed information establishes that NNGA and its employees repeatedly provided false responses to key questions in both written discovery and in deposition testimony.

The Executive Director of Narconon of Georgia (NNGA) is Mary Patrice Rieser, aka Mary Rieser.

Page 6:
Quote
On September 14th, 2010, Plaintiffs deposed Rieser for the second time, again, asking her about the critical issues in this case and specifically about investigations into housing issues and her knowledge of the events on the night of Patrick's death. Reiser's responses to these questions, we now know, were not simply misleading, but patently false.

(I think they mean September 14th, 2011.)

Page 9:
Quote
In the meantime, Plaintiffs were able to locate and contact a whistleblower and former NNGA student and employee, Allison Riepe, who had intimate knowledge of the workings of NNGA, including its housing practices and the events surrounding Patrick's death.10

Yes, Allison Riepe!  I love you! 

See the Footnote10 for more info.

Pages 12 and 13:
Quote
On March 30th, 2012, less than a week before the scheduled evidentiary hearing, and less than a month before the close of discovery, NNGA produced sixty-seven (67) pages of highly relevant documents, which included documents relating to the Urgent Directive as well as documents directly relevant to Patrick's death. ("The Board of Investigation Documents," Bates Nos. 009910-009976).

These documents contained information that had been repeatedly denied by NNGA throughout the litigation. For example, the documents included:
• Evidence of poor conditions at housing, such as a number of reports of:
   o Students drinking alcohol and sneaking out of housing. (Bates Nos. 009912, 009920, 009924).
   o Housing monitors failing to report for work. (Bates Nos. 009918, 009940).
   o Staff members using drugs and alcohol. (Bates Nos. 009926, 009944)
   o Lack of control over staff at housing. (Bates Nos. 009944);
   o Lack of supervision of students at housing. (Bates Nos. 009959)
   o Multiple complaints from students that drugs were too easily obtainable at housing. (Bates Nos. 009944)
   o Instances of students overdosing on heroin. (Bates Nos. 009944, 009957).
   o Substandard living conditions. (Bates No. 009968).
   o Requests from students to NNGA for changes to housing such as apartment searches, additional monitors, and enforcing a curfew. (Bates Nos. 009913).
• Evidence of complete control by NNGA over housing - most notably, directives from NNGA's Board of Directors placing Delgado Development on probation. (Bates Nos. 009943, 009945).
• Evidence that Delgado Development was opened and run solely to help NNGA make money, and, as a  result, housed only NNGA students. (Bates No. 0009959).

Just as the Discovery Course housing is doing currently: http://forum.reachingforthetippingpoint.net/index.php/topic,9939.msg21898.html#msg21898

They dumped Delgado and had Darrell Javier Hall, aka Damian Javier Hall, Darrell Hall, and Darrell/Damian J. Hall, open the same sort of housing arrangement, that continues to this day.

Page 15:
Quote
Like Patrick Desmond, Brad Taylor had been ordered by a court to enroll in an in-patient drug and alcohol rehabilitation facility in lieu of jail. (Riepe Dep., P. 14, L. 7). Taylor's student file included evidence that NNGA altered its letterhead to remove the words "out-patient" when they sent documents to the Tennessee drug court, just as they did when they sent letters to the Florida drug court in Patrick's case. (Bates Nos. 10122 - 10137). In short, the missing Taylor filed proved that the fraud perpetrated on the Florida drug court was not an isolated event. That is precisely why Plaintiffs believed it had not been produced.

Pages 15 and 16:
Quote
On April 11th , NNGA produced yet another new set of documents, consisting of 105 pages of critical information relating to the Board of Investigation, including housing surveys completed by students, graphs reviewed by the Board of Directors, and meeting minutes concerning the investigation into housing. (Bates Nos. 10012 - 10016). Like the initial set of Board of Investigation Documents, this newest set of documents provided further evidence of critical concerns about NNGA's housing, such as:
• Evidence of multiple reports complaining that "housing" and the "residential portion" of NNGA needed improvement. (Bates No. 10022, 10030, 10034).
• When asked whether students received enough explanations about how things could be improved at NNGA, one student responded: "Get monitors that give a [expletive deleted] in housing." (Bates No. 10036).
• When asked what NNGA could do to help new students, another student responded by writing: "Keep them away from (names redacted.)" The student then notes: "[T]hey" (presumably the individuals whose names are redacted) "still use drugs or alcohol." (Bates No. 10023). Another student responded to the same question by saying: "Don't treat them like dollar signs. Don't lie. Don't promise things that you know aren't true." (Bates No. 10092).
• Another student wrote that he felt hopeless when he got to NNGA because he saw "a lot of drinking, drug use, and general madness." (Bates No. 10025).
• Multiple students complained about how NNGA and housing did not meet their expectations and that the housing situation was not, in reality, what was represented to them prior to enrolling. (Bates Nos. 10026, 10040).
• One student suggested that "a tour of the facility and housing prior to [her] arrival would have improved [her] understanding of the program. (Bates No. 10033).

So sad...  To be hopeful about a new future without substance abuse, and then to feel "hopeless when he got to NNGA because he saw 'a lot of drinking, drug use, and general madness.'"  Emotional roller coasters are never good for people, but I imagine extremely less so for someone wanting to kick drugs and/or alcohol. 

I hope that anyone planning to attend Narconon of Georgia (or any other Narconon facility, for that matter, since we have the same sort of reports about all the Narconon branches) will see this first and reconsider.

Someone else can pick up here with the Brief, if they'd like.   :)
   Narconon Reviews
   Independent Reviews of the Narconon Drug Rehab Programs
   Answers to Frequently Asked But Seldom Answered Questions

Offline SocialTransparency

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 1,326
 Here are some photos of several named defendants in the Desmond V. Narconon of Georgia, Narconon International, et al wrongful death lawsuit.

 

  Above photo is Director and founder of NarCONon of Georgia,s Mary Rieser. Seated to the right of her is Darrell Hall, Director of Discoverycourse ( not currently named in the Desmond v Narconon of Ga/International lawsuit) which as we now know provides NarCONon of Georgia client housing and transportation. Picture is from a channel 2 Atlanta News broadcast taped during a SEPTEMBER 09 Sandy Springs Georgia zoning meeting concerning scientology,s zoning application for its Ideal Org.




 Above photo is Don Delgado of Delgado Development INC. Mr Delgado provided transportation and housing to NarCONon of Georgia. Patrick W Desmond was housed by Don Delgado.





 Above photo is Maria Delgado of Delgado Development INC.





 About photo again pictures Maria Delgado of Delgado Development @ the Sandy Springs Georgia zoning meeting concerning the church of scientology,s zoning variance application for its Ideal Org. To her right is Woodson Galloway formally of Dillard & Galloway who represents the church of scientology during the zoning variance application and whose firm currently represents the church of scientology in its RILUPA lawsuit against the city of Sandy Springs Georgia, the mayor and city council members. Photo also taken SEPTEMBER 09. For those in the know, yes! That is VP of scientology's Bob Adams head in the lower right.


 Would any of you allow these NARCONON of GEORGIA staff and SCIENTOLOGISTS to attempt drug or alcohol rehabilitation on your loved ones @ quite possibly the most difficult time in their lives?


 Bigger question is would YOU want these people to operate unimpeded within your community and advance scientology's twisted ideology? I dearly hope the good citizens of Sandy Springs Georgia see what this so called church is bringing to their community. Death and Despair! Yes my fellow posters, Death and Despair!


 The Channel 2 News photos are within the public domain. Don Delgados photo was found on the net. The 2 photos with Maria Delgado were taken by me during the course of the zoning meetings in Sandy Springs Georgia.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2012, 18:03 by SocialTransparency »

Offline Damian DeWitt

  • Met Xenu
  • Posts: 46
I have many more documents to post that came before this one, but I'm going to post this one out of sequence because y'all are gonna love this!


Further, there are documents and witnesses that still have not been produced even though discovery in this case is set to close next week!

That's just the 1st page, there are 36 more pages in the brief itself, and 20 pages of supporting exhibits.

Delicious dox are delicious.

Offline Mary_McConnell

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 2,888
    • Formerly Fooled Finally Free of The Deceptive Cult Called Scientology
Harris Penn Lowry Delcampo have produced the finest legal drafting in any Scientology-related case in the last four years. They do not write stupid things like "Narconon is an off-shoot of the Church of Scientology" knowing well that it is in fact a Scientology-related entity per the cult's declarations to the IRS.

This bodes well.

Congrats again to TP for superb coverage of the Desmond case.

Good post!  Losts of  ||||9000|||| ,too
I am a volunteer advocate for victims of the Narconon scam. I am a former scientologist. I post anonymously. Mary McConnell is my long time nom de plume. Feel free to contact me for assistance in righting the wrongs.

Offline ethercat

  • Global Moderator
  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 3,770
Ok, ready for another dox dump?

 ||||9000||||   

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-04-PlaintiffsMotionForOrderAllowingPlaintiffsToInstallAndBringCertainMultimediaEquipment.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-05-OrderAllowingPlaintiffsToInstallAndBringCertainMultimediaEquipment.pdf


Lisa Robbins apparently doesn't think she belongs in a RICO case, so she has made a motion to dismiss. 

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-05-LisaCarolinaRobbinsMotionToDismissForFailureToStateAClaim.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-05-BriefInSupportOfLisaCarolinaRobbinsMotionToDismissRICO-Claims.pdf

The Plaintiffs have filed a bunch of stuff with the court:
http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsNoticeOfFilingOriginalDiscovery.pdf

These were all filed in the court on the date in the filename, but many of them are items sent to the parties to the case, and filed with the court as Rule 5.2 Certificates:

Quote
Rule 5.2. Filing requirements.

(1) Depositions and other original discovery material shall not be filed with the court unless or until required by the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 9-11-29.1(a) (1) (5).
 
(2) A party serving Interrogatories, Requests for Production of Documents, Requests for Admission and Answers or responses thereto upon counsel, a party or a non party shall file with the court a certificate indicating the pleading which was served, the date of service (or that the same has been delivered for service with the summons) and the persons served.

These are all original discovery filings made by the Plaintiffs.  I tried to arrange these in the order the parties would have received them so that you have a sense of the order in which things happened.  Some of these are juicier than the dry and boring Rule 5.2 Certificates from the earlier parts of this thread.

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponseToLisaRobbins1stInterrogatories.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponsesToLisaRobbins1stRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponsesToNNGAs1stRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs1stSupplementalResponseToNNGAsAndLisaRobbins1stInterrogatoriesToPlaintiffs.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndInterrogatoriesToNarcononOfGeorgia.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs3rdInterrogatoriesToNarcononOfGeorgia.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs3rdRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToNarcononOfGeorgia.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToNNInt.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToNNInt.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs3rdInterrogatoriesToNNInt.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndInterrogatoriesToDelgadoDevelopment.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToDelgadoDevelopment.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs1stRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToRobbinsGroup.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToLisaRobbins.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndInterrogatoriesToSovereignPlace.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToSovereignPlace.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndInterrogatoriesToSovereignPlaceAptManagement.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToSovereignPlaceAptManagement.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsSupplementalResponseToNNGAs1stRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponsesToNNGAs2ndRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponsesToNNGAs2ndInterrogatoriesToPlaintiffs.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsSupplementalResponseToNNGAs2ndInterrogatoriesToPlaintiffs.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToNarcononOfGeorgia.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsSupplementalResponseToNNGAs2ndRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs4thInterrogatoriesToNarcononOfGeorgia.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsExpertDisclosures.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponseToNNGAs3rdRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponseToDelgadoDevelopments1stInterrogatories.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponseToDelgadoDevelopments1stRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsSupplementalResponseToNNGAs1stInterrogatoriesToPlaintiffs.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponseToDelgadoDevelopments2ndInterrogatories.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponsesToNNGAs3rdInterrogatoriesToPlaintiffs.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponseToNNGAs4thRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndSupplementalResponseToNNGAs1stRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponsesToNNGAs4thInterrogatoriesToPlaintiffs.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponsesToNNGAs5thInterrogatoriesToPlaintiffs.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsResponseToNNGAs5thRequestForProductionOfDocuments.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs4thRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToNarcononOfGeorgia.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs3rdRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToNNInt.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs3rdRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToDelgadoDevelopment.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs5thRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToNarcononOfGeorgia.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs4thRequestForProductionOfDocumentsToNNInt.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-Plaintiffs2ndSupplementalResponseToNNGAs1stInterrogatoriesToPlaintiffs.pdf

And now they ask the Defendants to file their originals also.
http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-10-PlaintiffsRequestForFilingOriginalDiscovery.pdf

There have since been a large number of Defendants' filings entered into the record (that were originally filed with the court as Rule 5.2 Certificates).  Here are 3 that looked interesting, but I have not gotten the rest from the courthouse yet. 

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-17-NNGAs1stRequestForAdmissionsToPlaintiffs.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-17-NNGAs1stSupplementalObjectionsAndResponsesToPlaintiffsFirstInterrogatories.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-17-NNIs1stSupplementalObjectionsAndResponsesToPlaintiffsFirstInterrogatories.pdf


After that, came these, of which you have already seen (or at least had the opportunity to see) the Plaintiffs' Brief in Support Of Motion for Sanctions:
http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-11-LetterToJudgeHydrickFromJeffreyHarris.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-13-NNGAsMotionForTimeToReplyToPlaintiffsOralMotionForSanctions.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-16-PlaintiffsBriefInsupportOfMotionForSanctions.pdf

And I guess Lisa Robbins has decided she needs to answer the Amended Complaint, even if she does think it should be dismissed (LOL).

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-18-AnswerOfLisaRobbinsAndTheRobbinsGroupToPlaintiffsFirstAmendedComplaint.pdf


   Narconon Reviews
   Independent Reviews of the Narconon Drug Rehab Programs
   Answers to Frequently Asked But Seldom Answered Questions

Offline Sunshine

  • Merchant of Chaos
  • Posts: 157
Holy Mackerel, very nice!

Offline mefree

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 4,367
Some light reading for the weekend. Nice!
The ultimate authority must always rest with the individual's own reason and critical analysis.
-Dalai Lama

Offline ethercat

  • Global Moderator
  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 3,770
I'll be reading right along with you because I haven't read all of these yet either.  I believe some of them have some attached exhibits that will be interesting to us, and possibly useful. 
   Narconon Reviews
   Independent Reviews of the Narconon Drug Rehab Programs
   Answers to Frequently Asked But Seldom Answered Questions

Offline Mary_McConnell

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 2,888
    • Formerly Fooled Finally Free of The Deceptive Cult Called Scientology
Wow! That's a lot of dox! In that post you may want to explain what a certificate 5.2 id for the newbies.

ps: These 3 below are getting error 404 NOT FOUND responses

re:
There have since been a large number of Defendants' filings entered into the record (that were originally filed with the court as Rule 5.2 Certificates).  Here are 3 that looked interesting, but I have not gotten the rest from the courthouse yet. 

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-17-NNGAs1stRequestForAdmissionsToPlaintiffs.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-17-NNGAs1stSupplementalObjectionsAndResponsesToPlaintiffsFirstInterrogatories.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-17-NNIs1stSupplementalObjectionsAndResponsesToPlaintiffsFirstInterrogatories.pdf

I am a volunteer advocate for victims of the Narconon scam. I am a former scientologist. I post anonymously. Mary McConnell is my long time nom de plume. Feel free to contact me for assistance in righting the wrongs.

Offline ethercat

  • Global Moderator
  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 3,770
Wow! That's a lot of dox! In that post you may want to explain what a certificate 5.2 id for the newbies.

 ooo:/  I thought I did, but to interpret the law I posted above: A Rule 5.2 Certificate is essentially a Certificate of Service, that is to say, it's a paper delivered to the court to certify that the actual documents were delivered to the party(ies) to the case. 

Discovery material and pleadings (i.e, dox) are not supposed to be filed with the court until they are needed (if needed) for the case.  I speculate that this is to save space in the courthouse, so there are not documents being stored there and taking up space unless they are actually going to be used in the case.

Quote
ps: These 3 below are getting error 404 NOT FOUND responses

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-17-NNGAs1stRequestForAdmissionsToPlaintiffs.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-17-NNGAs1stSupplementalObjectionsAndResponsesToPlaintiffsFirstInterrogatories.pdf

http://alley.ethercat.com/storage/10A28641/10A28641-2-2012-04-17-NNIs1stSupplementalObjectionsAndResponsesToPlaintiffsFirstInterrogatories.pdf

Fixed - I missed uploading them; they're there now, along with the 2012-04-18 Lisa Robbins Answer.
   Narconon Reviews
   Independent Reviews of the Narconon Drug Rehab Programs
   Answers to Frequently Asked But Seldom Answered Questions

Offline Mary_McConnell

  • High Value Target
  • Posts: 2,888
    • Formerly Fooled Finally Free of The Deceptive Cult Called Scientology
Thanks, ethercat. I just figured explaining it in full with these dox would be helpful for the newbies just jumping onto the from  'Latest Comments' link :)
I am a volunteer advocate for victims of the Narconon scam. I am a former scientologist. I post anonymously. Mary McConnell is my long time nom de plume. Feel free to contact me for assistance in righting the wrongs.